Realistically who would you have as Rangers manager?

250 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, Prso's headband said:

Because there is better players than Waghorn here and by all accounts he is unhappy. Players are easily replaced.

The manager is trying to build something different here and set us up playing a good brand of football and instilling that into the academy. At that end of the scale continuity is key. Calling for the managers head after 12 games is mental. You just going to keep calling for every managers head until they start winning their first 12 games?

It's not 12 games, we've been shite for about 8 months and for the 3 or 4 months before that we were inconsistent at best.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, loyalfollower said:

Frank mcparland came with a reputation of unearthing younger talent and then selling them on.

Hes been here 2 transfer windows and the players still need time to develop, unless you expect us to sign the next messi.

So who have we signed that's an unearthed gem and can sell on?in fact when was the last time sold anyone instead of giving them free transfers?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, geneva_ger said:

Again, and only devils advocate

Would Barry Ferguson feature any time?

Do we stick with the plan or do we need the grunts back to toughen us up, or even support MW

If he proves himself as a good manager at a good level then aye, until he does that his name shouldn't be brought up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

So who have we signed that's an unearthed gem and can sell on?in fact when was the last time sold anyone instead of giving them free transfers?

Potentially Windass and Rossiter but out of however many we've signed it's not a great return. Both were already known tho so wouldn't call them unearthed gems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Max1872 said:

Potentially Windass and Rossiter but out of however many we've signed it's not a great return. Both were already known tho so wouldn't call them unearthed gems.

Rossiter will amount to fuck-all IMO

windass id actually build a team round him unlike they 2 wastes of space Holt and Halliday do that and maybe yup

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Realistically I'd like Mark Warburton, version 2.0.

We've seen a Rangers team coached by him play the best football since Advocaat and he's clearly changing the ethos of thump it the park and win knock downs as our style of play. In the modern world if football that had to happen.

What we've also seen is some strange decisions with signings and a reluctance to change style throughout a game. If plan A isn't working, plan B shouldn't be to do plan A better, which seems to be a barrier for him.

If he can change those things then he's got a real chance of winning and winning in style. Personally think he'll be off at the end of the season anyway (the signings of Barton, Senderos and Niko appear to be a philosophy of 'I've got one shot and I'm going with experience to try and get it') but I'd genuinely like to see him succeed and stay long term. Don't really see it happening though.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

Rossiter will amount to fuck-all IMO

windass id actually build a team round him unlike they 2 wastes of space Holt and Halliday do that and maybe yup

Too early to tell one way or another on Rossiter but I like the look of him. Agree on Windass. I think Halliday's good enough to be a mainstay in the team albeit further forward, Holt as much as I like him squad player at best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, markem said:

I doubt anyone has read this far to be honest

I did, and beyond, and it is from your heart

Nowt wrong with what you said mate

We'll see

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, K.A.I said:

Rossiter will amount to fuck-all IMO

windass id actually build a team round him unlike they 2 wastes of space Holt and Halliday do that and maybe yup

You seem to be a bit slow, but let me try and catch you up. Halliday and Holt, who ran rings round a near identical fenian midfield not too long ago, should be our spine. For some reason the leadership felt that recruiting big names on high wages would startle celtic - unable to foresee that they would deploy their warchest at the first sight of trouble - in Rodgers, Sinclair and Dembele..

We can beat the paedos this season, but it will take a revolutionary change of thinking in the managers part. If not, bid farewell and recruit a proper Rangers man to guide us through the storm and prevent ten in a row which shouldn't even be on the cards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, yermaw145 said:

You seem to be a bit slow, but let me try and catch you up. Halliday and Holt, who ran rings round a near identical fenian midfield not too long ago, should be our spine. For some reason the leadership felt that recruiting big names on high wages would startle celtic - unable to foresee that they would deploy their warchest at the first sight of trouble - in Rodgers, Sinclair and Dembele..

We can beat the paedos this season, but it will take a revolutionary change of thinking in the managers part. If not, bid farewell and recruit a proper Rangers man to guide us through the storm and prevent ten in a row which shouldn't even be on the cards.

I'm a bit slowing coming from a scruffy cunt that says Holt and Halliday should be the spine of our team? Forgive me for pishing myself laughing

Ross County midfield ran rings round Celtic the other week that mean we should build a team round their midfielders too aye ?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

Holt and Halliday should be the spine of our team

I do concur with KAI at this @yermaw comment. Sorry Maw but it was a one-off. These guys are tradesmen and I won't put them down but they are so limited. We should be building for European football next term. I cannot slag down MW either and believe that he honestly (me too) thought Rossiter, Windass and Crooks would develop towards this end. I still hope that's the case. Sadly most of the others will not make that grade.

Holt and Halliday ... It's not enough to just say they are "one of us"

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Max1872 said:

Potentially Windass and Rossiter but out of however many we've signed it's not a great return. Both were already known tho so wouldn't call them unearthed gems.

Windass runs fast and runs in people he shirks a tackle and looks half the player his dad was Rossiter I've not seen him enough to judge him. Windass struggled badly against the filth to the point of not knowing if he was on the park

We have too many of that type of player now who look decent against lesser opposition.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, geneva_ger said:

I do concur with KAI at this @yermaw comment. Sorry Maw but it was a one-off. These guys are tradesmen and I won't put them down but they are so limited. We should be building for European football next term. I cannot slag down MW either and believe that he honestly (me too) thought Rossiter, Windass and Crooks would develop towards this end. I still hope that's the case. Sadly most of the others will not make that grade.

Holt and Halliday ... It's not enough to just say they are "one of us"

Holt isn't even one of us he's a Jambo

not that that's the issue - it's not realistic to have 11 good quality blue noses playing for you but in the top flight he looks the Sheff United squad player and Hearts reject - that sounds harsh he's not as bad as that sounds but he's not the calibre we need

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, yermaw145 said:

You seem to be a bit slow, but let me try and catch you up. Halliday and Holt, who ran rings round a near identical fenian midfield not too long ago, should be our spine. For some reason the leadership felt that recruiting big names on high wages would startle celtic - unable to foresee that they would deploy their warchest at the first sight of trouble - in Rodgers, Sinclair and Dembele..

We can beat the paedos this season, but it will take a revolutionary change of thinking in the managers part. If not, bid farewell and recruit a proper Rangers man to guide us through the storm and prevent ten in a row which shouldn't even be on the cards.

Basically your saying we should build a team round Holt and Halliday?

God help us if that ever happens....

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like Donald Trump - just so we can build a wall around Ibrox and keep those Mexicans oot.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my humble opinion there are a lot of people who need a reality check. We are not in a position financially to compete yet. We have struggled through the divisions to get back here but it will be a few years before we are really happy with the team and the management.

How people can turn their opinions round so quickly amazes me. The man who got us through the final hurdle and was considered a god is now not good enough for the job.

Please people, just relax and support the team. I'm old enough to have seen many a poor Rangers team struggling to compete. We will get back to our best eventually but it's not now and there's no point turning on the manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, IanFerguson2013 said:

In my humble opinion there are a lot of people who need a reality check. We are not in a position financially to compete yet. We have struggled through the divisions to get back here but it will be a few years before we are really happy with the team and the management.

How people can turn their opinions round so quickly amazes me. The man who got us through the final hurdle and was considered a god is now not good enough for the job.

Please people, just relax and support the team. I'm old enough to have seen many a poor Rangers team struggling to compete. We will get back to our best eventually but it's not now and there's no point turning on the manager.

2

Dont be surprised next week, after Scotland fire him if you have some on here suggesting WGC for the Scotland manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IanFerguson2013 said:

In my humble opinion there are a lot of people who need a reality check. We are not in a position financially to compete yet. We have struggled through the divisions to get back here but it will be a few years before we are really happy with the team and the management.

How people can turn their opinions round so quickly amazes me. The man who got us through the final hurdle and was considered a god is now not good enough for the job.

Please people, just relax and support the team. I'm old enough to have seen many a poor Rangers team struggling to compete. We will get back to our best eventually but it's not now and there's no point turning on the manager.

I've been drinking so this might not be a good idea,but here goes

We didn't struggle through the divisions. We romped the first two and should have came through the championship at the first attempt.

I applaud MW for getting us back to the top league, but he only did what he was expected to do and what should have been done a season earlier.

I am disappointed that the Barton situation wasn't handled better, but all Barton had to do was apologise, so I support MW 100% in that respect. However where I struggle to support him is in his intransigence in sticking with a formation/style of football that just isn't working.

Perhaps MW wasn't happy with the funds made available to him in the Summer,well I wasn't happy that I didn't always get what I wanted for Christmas. But I certainly made the best of what I did get. However I'm not convinced that MW is making the best of what he currently has.

He's been unlucky that two of our most promising signings will play no further part in this campaign, but he still has resources better than any other team in Scotland bar one.

Whilst I hoped we could win the league this year, I didn't really think it was on. But I thought we could give them a bit of a challenge. However apart from getting thumped by them we have dropped 13 points to other (lesser?) teams.

There are 27 points up for grabs before we can strengthen the team. If we continue to drop points at the current rate then 15 of those 27 points will be lost.

We can moan about lack of investment, we can say we need a reality check, but the only person who can get us those 27 points is MW and he's not going to do it with his 4 fucking 3 fucking 3 formation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smiled at Barton's twitter comment about the England manager........"Regardless of the result, Southgate shouldn't be England manager. Lovely guy. But not experienced enough. Got to get an elite level coach."

I suppose he could also have been talking about another manager eh?

That's the thing now with the Barton 'issue' - the acrimony of its origin and then evolution by the way it was handled by the Club will lead for a while to comments by Barton on one subject being used as convenient 'cover' for comments relating to the Ibrox issue. If not that, then it leaves a very neat door open for journos to follow that sort of twitter comment up with a question - couched in general terms and not directly related to the 'issue' - about management at Rangers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Reformation Bear said:

Smiled at Barton's twitter comment about the England manager........"Regardless of the result, Southgate shouldn't be England manager. Lovely guy. But not experienced enough. Got to get an elite level coach."

I suppose he could also have been talking about another manager eh?

That's the thing now with the Barton 'issue' - the acrimony of its origin and then evolution by the way it was handled by the Club will lead for a while to comments by Barton on one subject being used as convenient 'cover' for comments relating to the Ibrox issue. If not that, then it leaves a very neat door open for journos to follow that sort of twitter comment up with a question - couched in general terms and not directly related to the 'issue' - about management at Rangers.

(tu)

I can foresee a shit-load of subliminal digs coming our way from Barton and his twitter/media followers.

Pretty quiet just now but can't see it staying that way for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need someone who was successful as a player, knows Scottish football, has international experience, managed at the top level, and in different countries, and is able to build a team of his own style of players and stick with it.

Also need to be someone who is likely to be available soon to start the rebuild quickly.

How about Gordon Strac.................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one has mentioned derek mcinnes i think?

with much money Klopp ( he won the league with liverpool, rodgers coudnt)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, ale_ said:

no one has mentioned derek mcinnes i think?

with much money Klopp ( he won the league with liverpool, rodgers coudnt)

I think one of us has been at the Ale

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/11/2016 at 3:48 PM, yermaw145 said:

Halliday and Holt, who ran rings round a near identical fenian midfield not too long ago, should be our spine.

oh dear...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now